7.1.0 Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Guides and discussions of all things specific to the Ice Lancers of Azeroth.
Chuk
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:19 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Chuk Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:58 am

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/character/m ... ago/simple


Anybody know what I am doing wrong? i am only pulling like 220k the only thing I can think of is maybe my artifact lvl is too low? I don't have to icecicle golden trait yet, but i can't imagine that alone is holding me back that much.
This build relies heavily on mastery and critical. Also, you need higher item level to get the most of it (it begins to be really good past 870 ilvl correctly itemized) You have decent crit, but your mastery is way too low. Your trinkets don't help either.

Try to aim for more mastery and get stat sticks with intelect / mastery or intelect / crit.


On a different note, is this build being massively nerfed on PTR? I just simmed this build with nightly PTR SimC and the DPS loss is massive. Guess the frostbolt damage loss really hurts this build a lot.
Rikx
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 5:21 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Rikx Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:56 am

This build relies heavily on mastery and critical. Also, you need higher item level to get the most of it (it begins to be really good past 870 ilvl correctly itemized) You have decent crit, but your mastery is way too low. Your trinkets don't help either.
I'd be hesitant about claiming critical is heavily relied upon. I'm a bit stuck on redoing the RoP APL, but with the APL we've been using (which just appears to drop RoP whenever it pleases), there appears to be a relation between haste and crit. Something along the lines of "haste should be 2/3 of crit rating", but that is just a guess.

You can easily see it if you play around with SimC yourself, by adding and changing gear_haste_rating and gear_crit_rating.
User avatar
hellfreeze
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:38 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby hellfreeze Wed Nov 23, 2016 5:07 am

I'm a bit stuck on redoing the RoP APL, but with the APL we've been using (which just appears to drop RoP whenever it pleases)
The current APL should be holding ROP for use with IV/CTTC. The ROP between IVs doesn't matter when it is used. There is no real advantage to syncing it with GS because ROP_FBs = ROP_GS beacuse both benefit from it and add to biger GSs.
Rikx
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 5:21 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Rikx Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:25 am

The current APL should be holding ROP for use with IV/CTTC. The ROP between IVs doesn't matter when it is used. There is no real advantage to syncing it with GS because ROP_FBs = ROP_GS beacuse both benefit from it and add to biger GSs.
I didn't see anything that suggested it was holding it to use with IV, because it was assuming it'd be up as long as possible via TV.

Aside from that... RoPs between IVs should matter, because GS will double-dip on Rune of Power. It'll get a bigger icicle, and then that icicle damage will get increased again by RoP.

Some rough napkinmath, assuming 100% mastery for simplicity:
Regular 5FB+1GS rotation = 1800% spellpower total
RoP boosted 5FB+1GS rotation = 3487.5% spellpower
together, 5287.5% spellpower over two rotations

2 regular Frostbolts + 3 RoP Frostbolts + 1 RoP GS = 3172.5% spellpower
2 RoP Frostbolts + 3 Regular Frostbolts + 1 Regular GS = 2010% spellpower
together, 5182.5% spellpower over two rotations

Unfortunately, as Zulandia pointed out on Discord when I brought it up, SimC is not properly accounting for versatility and possibly other buffs in Glacial Spike. At the very least, this should throw off stat weights for versatility something horribly.

https://github.com/simulationcraft/simc/issues/3187
User avatar
hellfreeze
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:38 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby hellfreeze Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:47 am

Are you talking about the GS APL in this thread, because it does sync ROP with IV. All the testing I did with syncing the ROP between IVs had little effect, so the APL just uses it when it is a bout to cap unless IV is about to come off CD.
Rikx
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 5:21 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Rikx Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:11 am

Are you talking about the GS APL in this thread, because it does sync ROP with IV. All the testing I did with syncing the ROP between IVs had little effect, so the APL just uses it when it is a bout to cap unless IV is about to come off CD.
Yeah. I'm still a novice when it comes to this stuff. After reviewing, I see where it synced up now. For some reason the cooldown.icy_veins.remains<cast_time wasn't making sense to me.
Nanogiant
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:31 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Nanogiant Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:51 pm

On a different note, is this build being massively nerfed on PTR? I just simmed this build with nightly PTR SimC and the DPS loss is massive. Guess the frostbolt damage loss really hurts this build a lot.
They removed Frost Armor (-8% haste). It's a catastrophe to say the least. I honestly don't see how Frost can even be significant or viable in 7.1.5. If I am wrong, please say I am wrong.

Frost Bolt damage in itself shouldn't be the problem since they buffed Glacial Spike damage. If I calculated it right, we would do more damage just considering Icicles + Glacial 7.1.5 vs. Live.
fungames22
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:39 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby fungames22 Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:32 pm

On a different note, is this build being massively nerfed on PTR? I just simmed this build with nightly PTR SimC and the DPS loss is massive. Guess the frostbolt damage loss really hurts this build a lot.
They removed Frost Armor (-8% haste). It's a catastrophe to say the least. I honestly don't see how Frost can even be significant or viable in 7.1.5. If I am wrong, please say I am wrong.

Frost Bolt damage in itself shouldn't be the problem since they buffed Glacial Spike damage. If I calculated it right, we would do more damage just considering Icicles + Glacial 7.1.5 vs. Live.
This is horrible! - thoughts on switching to a high crit lonely winter build with IF instead of BC and RoP in 7.1.5? I think stat priority will be int>crit>haste>mastery=verse and crit up to 52% then haste becomes better.
poorprae
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby poorprae Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:54 am

Rotation-related questions, go easy on me.

1. What is the priority when ROP is active? GS and FB 4-5 times?

2. If BF procs, is there a specific time to use Flurry or just asap?

3. If I have 1 or more FoF, I use it outside of ROP, correct? If not, when is the correct time?

In a nutshell, my confusion lies in when - outside of ROP - to use FoF IL and BF Flurry.
Potaetoe
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 12:06 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Potaetoe Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:03 am

Rotation-related questions, go easy on me.

1. What is the priority when ROP is active? GS and FB 4-5 times?

2. If BF procs, is there a specific time to use Flurry or just asap?

3. If I have 1 or more FoF, I use it outside of ROP, correct? If not, when is the correct time?

In a nutshell, my confusion lies in when - outside of ROP - to use FoF IL and BF Flurry.
Priority in RoP is probably something like, go in with 5 icicles-> RoP GS -> FB spam -> Flurry when it's available -> GS if you can.

2) Brainfreeze procs are something you should always use at the end of a FB. If you can try to line up FB -> Flurry -> Chain Reaction at 2+ stacks and IL (probably worth)... maybe... maybe not. Don't believe the APL does it.

3) Use FoF only during movement where you can't frostbolt.... so practically never.
poorprae
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby poorprae Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:09 am

Does GS->Flurry (Flurry hits before GS at >23 yards...?) do anything for GS's damage?

Though my gear is above average, I find that my GS is only hitting for 1.7-1.8 million max.

http://www.askmrrobot.com/wow/gear/us/s ... raelicious" target="_blank
hasublade
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:40 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby hasublade Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:23 pm

Image
Any idea how he did this?
poorprae
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby poorprae Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:21 pm

Rotation-related questions, go easy on me.
Priority in RoP is probably something like, go in with 5 icicles-> RoP GS -> FB spam -> Flurry when it's available -> GS if you can.

2) Brainfreeze procs are something you should always use at the end of a FB. If you can try to line up FB -> Flurry -> Chain Reaction at 2+ stacks and IL (probably worth)... maybe... maybe not. Don't believe the APL does it.
Assuming I'm in a non-IV ROP, after I use GS and I have a BF proc, what do I do?

You mentioned it is better to FB->Flurry. So, after I GS in ROP, do I FB ~3 times and Flurry?
fungames22
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:39 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby fungames22 Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:41 pm

Hey guys, awesome thread - Anyone have sims for infernal writ? it is not listed anywhere in top 20 on our trinket sims? I'm sure it would be higher...
fungames22
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:39 pm

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby fungames22 Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:43 pm

Image
Any idea how he did this?
I hit 9M all the time with 70% mastery and about the same amount of intellect and un optimal crits on my frostbolts during raid. He probably got 5 crits on the target dummies, plus he has 90% mastery and a 5% damage ring. Its feasible.
poorprae
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby poorprae Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:50 am

70% mastery? WOWZER. Guess I really am behind at 57% unbuffed.

ADD: Question about BF procs. Wouldn't you use it (Flurry) first and follow it up with GS?

BF proc enables Winter's Chill for Flurry. Would that not increase GS's chance to crit by +50% thanks to Shatter?
User avatar
Norrinir
Global Moderator
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:44 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Norrinir Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:31 am

70% mastery? WOWZER. Guess I really am behind at 57% unbuffed.

ADD: Question about BF procs. Wouldn't you use it (Flurry) first and follow it up with GS?

BF proc enables Winter's Chill for Flurry. Would that not increase GS's chance to crit by +50% thanks to Shatter?
Glacial Spike is too fast. You'd have to use Shimmer to do this. And the situations in which you would really want to do this are also the same situations where you're standing in Rune of Power, so it's not really an option.
poorprae
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby poorprae Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:11 am

Thanks for the reply. A few more questions:

#1. When is it best to squeeze in a BF proc? During ROP or outside of ROP? If outside, should I use FB->BF or does it not matter?

#2. Any reason to use FOF IL? The SimC profile says I should be using it, but I don't know when to do so.
Daerron
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:25 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Daerron Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:37 am

Shouldnt optimal ROP rotation look like this: ROP>FB>FB>FB>FB>FB>GS (with enouth haste to finish GS cast) or FB>ROP>FB>FB>FB>FB>GS (with no external haste)? Reason is simple: double dipping on icicle damage. Say you have no crit (simplicity sake) and cast frostbolt for 100k damage. Also say u have 100% mastery, so 100k is saved as icicle. So with 5 casts u save 500k which then hit as GS + some spelldamage bonus, say another 500k, resulting in 1 mil hit. But if u cast your FB in ROP and each FB hits for 150k, u deposit 750k icile damage and this damage is again multiplyed by ROP when GS damage is calculated : (750+500)*1,5=1,875 mil GS.
If otherwise u cast rune first, then GS, and then FB for the rest of it your first GS woul do 500+500)*1,5=1,5 mil and second (due to bonus icicle damage) would do 750+500=1,25 mil, so overall bonus is 750k versus 875 k in first ROP rotation. This is not 100% accurate math, but u get the idea.
Katsumi
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:21 am

Re: Glacial Spike T19M Profile and Spec Explanation

Unread postby Katsumi Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:45 am

Hey guys,

This build is a blast to play, thanks for all the information this thread is providing. I've tried it in high M+ where we pull smaller groups with cc and so far the results have been quite positive, especially in HoV, MoS and NL. The RNG element does not seem to be an issue over the course of a full dungeon, but something else might be.

Due to this week's affixes our tank starts to kite when the mobs enrage and the debuff stacks are getting too high. However, the root that GS applies has been rather dangerous for our melee dps. They get whacked as soon as the freeze procs and the tank is no longer in melee range, something that took us quite few frontline deaths to realize in the first place.

Any thoughts on this? I'd hate to play this style only in raids :/

Return to “Frost”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests